Kenneth Shurtz focuses his practice on patent prosecution and counseling in the medical and mechanical arts.
Prior to joining the legal profession, Mr. Shurtz was a mechanical engineer for a Silicon Valley high technology company where he designed and implemented various remediation systems to address environmentally-impacted soil and ground water. He was also a mechanical/environmental engineer for URS Corporation. In addition, Mr. Shurtz is a registered Professional Engineer (P.E.) with the state of California.
University of California, Hastings College of the Law, J.D. (2009) cum laude, Cali and Witkin Award in Patent Law, Contracts Case Studies and Insurance Law, Hastings Business Law Journal, Senior Articles Editor
Wichita State University, B.S., Mechanical Engineering (2001) cum laude, Tau Beta Pi and Pi Tau Sigma
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (2010)
American Bar Association
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Hastings Intellectual Property & Cyber Law Society, Founder/Co-President (2008-2009)
San Francisco Intellectual Property Law Association
Bay Area Lawyers for Individual Freedom, an LGBT Bar Association
Human Rights Campaign
Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.