Stephanie Bedard focuses her practice on complex commercial litigation.
Prior to joining the firm, Ms. Bedard was a judicial clerk to the Honorable Virginia Emerson Hopkins in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama in Birmingham, Alabama.
While attending law school, Ms. Bedard worked as a summer associate for the firm in 2015. During the summer of 2014, she served as a law clerk in the Special Proceedings Division of the U.S. Attorneys’ Office in Washington, D.C. While in law school, she served as President and previously as Vice President of Virginia Law Women and was Assistant Special Projects Editor and a member of the Managing Board of the Virginia Law & Business Review.
Prior to law school, Ms. Bedard worked as a legislative assistant for a member of Congress in Washington, D.C. and was responsible for legislation involving healthcare, energy, the environment, agriculture, education, labor, and technology.
Ms. Bedard is conversational in French.
Insights View All
University of Virginia School of Law, J.D. (2016)
University of Virginia, B.A., English and French (2011) with high distinction
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (2017)
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama - Honorable Virginia Emerson Hopkins (Aug 2016-Aug 2017)
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.