Insights: Alerts 5 Takeaways: Ex Parte Appeals: A Multi-Year & Expensive Trajectory or an Allowance within 2 Months?
Kilpatrick Townsend attorneys Kate Gaudry, Ph. D. and Sameer Vadera recently presented to the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) Software Related Inventions Committee regarding “Ex Parte Appeals: A Multi-Year & Expensive Trajectory or an Allowance within 2 Months?”
5 Key Takeaways from the presentation include:
Options after receiving a Final Rejection:
- Abandon application
- Keep working with the examiner (e.g., interview, file Request for Continued Examination)
- Engage a supervisor (via a Pre-Appeal Brief Conference or requesting supervisor’s attendance at an interview)
- Initiate an appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)
Traditional opinions of disadvantages of an appeal:
- Delay: PTAB decisions generally are not issued until years after the appeal is initiated
- Expense: Notice of Appeal ($800, PTO fee for large entity) + Attorney fees for drafting an Appeal Brief (industry average of $5800) + Forwarding Fee ($2000, PTO fee for large entity)
Research Result #1 — Many appeals receive quick and positive results:
- 20% of appeals are pulled from the appeal cycle by an examiner/supervisor via an allowance (before an Examiner Answer, which is within approximately 2 months from an Appeal Brief filing)
- An additional 20% of appeals are pulled from the appeal cycle via a new office action (before an Examiner Answer), and most of these cases end up being allowed
- Thus, 40% of appeals avoid the multi-year delay and $2000 Forwarding Fee
Research Result #2 — Applications assigned to art units with higher allowance rates are more likely to have quick and positive results:
- There is a positive correlation between an art unit’s allowance rate and a probability of an examiner/supervisor pulling an appeal from the appeal cycle before an Examiner Answer (within approximately 2 months)
- There is a positive correlation between an art unit’s allowance rate and a probability that any early-appeal exit is an allowance (versus an office action)
Conclusion — Appeals offer different advantages in different circumstances:
- Applications assigned to an art unit with a low allowance rate: opportunity to engage other decision-makers not associated with such dismal statistics
- Applications assigned to an art unit with a high allowance rate: substantial probability of receiving a quick allowance
- Advantageous to use high-level and application-specific statistics to inform prosecution decisions
While we are pleased to have you contact us by telephone, surface mail, electronic mail, or by facsimile transmission, contacting Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP or any of its attorneys does not create an attorney-client relationship. The formation of an attorney-client relationship requires consideration of multiple factors, including possible conflicts of interest. An attorney-client relationship is formed only when both you and the Firm have agreed to proceed with a defined engagement.
DO NOT CONVEY TO US ANY INFORMATION YOU REGARD AS CONFIDENTIAL UNTIL A FORMAL CLIENT-ATTORNEY RELATIONSHIP HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.
If you do convey information, you recognize that we may review and disclose the information, and you agree that even if you regard the information as highly confidential and even if it is transmitted in a good faith effort to retain us, such a review does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could be used against you.